🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.